<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 10 steps towards a new austere Twitter</title>
	<atom:link href="http://mediatransparent.com/2009/08/04/10-steps-towards-a-new-austere-twitter/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://mediatransparent.com/2009/08/04/10-steps-towards-a-new-austere-twitter/</link>
	<description>Hyperlocal Brand Management + Media Development</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 31 Mar 2012 18:22:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pat Kitano</title>
		<link>http://mediatransparent.com/2009/08/04/10-steps-towards-a-new-austere-twitter/comment-page-1/#comment-1180</link>
		<dc:creator>Pat Kitano</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2009 01:08:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediatransparent.com/?p=541#comment-1180</guid>
		<description>More commentary on this article at &lt;a href=&quot;http://mediatransparent.com/2009/08/04/10-steps-towards-a-new-austere-twitter/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Social Media Today&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>More commentary on this article at <a href="http://mediatransparent.com/2009/08/04/10-steps-towards-a-new-austere-twitter/" rel="nofollow">Social Media Today</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pat Kitano</title>
		<link>http://mediatransparent.com/2009/08/04/10-steps-towards-a-new-austere-twitter/comment-page-1/#comment-1179</link>
		<dc:creator>Pat Kitano</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2009 01:05:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediatransparent.com/?p=541#comment-1179</guid>
		<description>Thanks Steve, I agree that it&#039;s important to personalize the business, so these rules aren&#039;t steadfast. The conversations, as they relate to business and not where tonight&#039;s party is, are in context with the business at hand. I&#039;ve tried to demonstrate this philosophy on my Twitter feed @&lt;a href=&quot;http://twitter.com/pkitano&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;pkitano&lt;/a&gt;.

All of what you say about how Twitter can create genuine connections is true. My definition of &quot;pristine&quot; is more attuned to the care a business or individual has in putting their best foot forward in their online presence, whether it&#039;s a Twitter feed, a blog or a comment in the New York Times.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Steve, I agree that it&#8217;s important to personalize the business, so these rules aren&#8217;t steadfast. The conversations, as they relate to business and not where tonight&#8217;s party is, are in context with the business at hand. I&#8217;ve tried to demonstrate this philosophy on my Twitter feed @<a href="http://twitter.com/pkitano" rel="nofollow">pkitano</a>.</p>
<p>All of what you say about how Twitter can create genuine connections is true. My definition of &#8220;pristine&#8221; is more attuned to the care a business or individual has in putting their best foot forward in their online presence, whether it&#8217;s a Twitter feed, a blog or a comment in the New York Times.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Gaines</title>
		<link>http://mediatransparent.com/2009/08/04/10-steps-towards-a-new-austere-twitter/comment-page-1/#comment-1177</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Gaines</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Aug 2009 10:58:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediatransparent.com/?p=541#comment-1177</guid>
		<description>Seems to me that being too &quot;pristine&quot; as a business removes some of the advantage and power of connecting with people (customers).  Twitter allows people to get to know behind a person who&#039;s behind a business; to see something beyond the logo.   That can be quite refreshing - IF the person who is the face of a given business is genuine and transparent.  

Along those same lines there is a lot of buzz about the release of Izea&#039;s Sponsored Tweets.  I can&#039;t help but think that attaching a &quot;paid for&quot; disclosure is likely going to sabotage a lot of previously built trust.  But when I posted thoughts on that yesterday it created quite a lively debate.  Ultimately, it just seems that Twitter&#039;s allure and power is the ability to connect with people one ordinarily might not have access to and to then share and exchange ideas.  When that person I&#039;ve connected with also owns a company, that&#039;s a powerful chance to build trust way before I might ever even think of doing business there.  But if that relationship is never allowed to get past &quot;how&#039;s the weather&quot;, all in an attempt to be pristine and never risk offending, I think the purpose is lost.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Seems to me that being too &#8220;pristine&#8221; as a business removes some of the advantage and power of connecting with people (customers).  Twitter allows people to get to know behind a person who&#8217;s behind a business; to see something beyond the logo.   That can be quite refreshing &#8211; IF the person who is the face of a given business is genuine and transparent.  </p>
<p>Along those same lines there is a lot of buzz about the release of Izea&#8217;s Sponsored Tweets.  I can&#8217;t help but think that attaching a &#8220;paid for&#8221; disclosure is likely going to sabotage a lot of previously built trust.  But when I posted thoughts on that yesterday it created quite a lively debate.  Ultimately, it just seems that Twitter&#8217;s allure and power is the ability to connect with people one ordinarily might not have access to and to then share and exchange ideas.  When that person I&#8217;ve connected with also owns a company, that&#8217;s a powerful chance to build trust way before I might ever even think of doing business there.  But if that relationship is never allowed to get past &#8220;how&#8217;s the weather&#8221;, all in an attempt to be pristine and never risk offending, I think the purpose is lost.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

